Suppose we are involved in developing a program to support young women with disabilities to improve their access to education and employment opportunities. Îin this context, we can use the proposal comparison method to evaluate different approaches:
Proposal 1: "Individualized Educational Assistance"
This proposal focuses on the provision of individualized educational assistance for every young person with disabilities. This would involve providing support teachers and resources tailored to each student.
Proposal 2: "Mentoring and Social Inclusion"
This second proposal focuses on facilitating mentoring for young people with disabilities . In addition, it promotes social inclusion by organizing events and activities that involve both young people with disabilities and those without disabilities.
Proposition 3: "Development of Professional Competencies"
This proposal emphasizes the development of the professional skills of young people with disabilities through specialized training programs and internships in the work environment. The aim is to prepare them for integration into the labor market.
Step 1: Evaluation of Prospects
Îbefore choosing a proposal, the group examines the advantages and disadvantages of each option. For example, individualized tutoring could provide specific support for each student, but could be expensive. Mentoring and social inclusion could contribute to the development of social skills, but could require considerable resources to organize events. Developing professional skills could increase the chances of employment, but would require careful planning of internships.
Step 2: Identifying Trade-offs
The group could identify the aspects in which the proposals can complement each other. For example, individualized educational assistance can be combined with professional skills development to provide comprehensive support to young people with disabilities.
Step 3: Shared Decision
After discussions and debates, the group reaches a decision common. It can be a choice between proposals or a combination of several proposals. The aim is to reach a consensus on how to approach the problem and decide on future actions.
This method of comparing proposals can help identify the best approach to support young women with disabilities, taking into account multiple perspectives and finding a compromise that meets the needs of this group of beneficiaries.
